Mad Cow
or
Mad Prophet?

This article will examine Ellen White's prophecies regarding the safety of consuming animal products. In 1896 Ellen White prophesied that in a "short time" it would soon be unsafe to eat any animal product.

"The LORD would bring His people into a position where they will not touch or taste the flesh of dead animals. Then let not these things be prescribed by any physicians who have a knowledge of the truth for this time. There is no safety in eating the flesh of dead animals, and in a short time the milk of the cows will also be excluded from the diet of God's commandment-keeping people. In a short time it will not be safe to use anything that comes from the animal creation. Those who take God at His word, and obey His commandments with the whole heart, will be blessed."²

"The light given me is that it will not be very long before we shall have to give up any animal food. Even milk will have to be discarded. Disease is accumulating rapidly."³

In 1901 she continues hammering the vegan message:

"Soon butter will never be recommended, and after a time milk will be entirely discarded; for disease in animals is increasing in proportion to the increase of wickedness among men. The time will come when there will be no safety in using eggs, milk, cream, or butter."⁴

1. It is unsafe to eat meat, and Adventists should not eat, or even touch, animal flesh.
2. Milk will soon be unsafe and will have to be discarded.
3. Any animal product will be unsafe "soon," "in a "short time," and "not very long" from now.

She was so alarmed about the "soon" coming dangers of animal products that she taught her followers to teach the people to cook without animal products.

"Let the diet reform be progressive. Let the people be taught how to prepare food without the use of milk or butter. Tell them that the time will soon come when there will be no safety in using eggs, milk, cream or butter, because disease in animals is increasing in proportion to the increase of wickedness among men."⁵

"The diet reform should be progressive. As disease in animals increases, the use of milk and eggs will become more and more unsafe. An effort should be made to supply their place with other things that are healthful and inexpensive. The people everywhere should be taught how to cook without milk and eggs, so far as possible, and yet have their food wholesome and palatable."⁶

Is Eating Meat More Unsafe Today?⁷

There are literally billions of people on this planet that eat meat. What are the facts about meat? Is it really unsafe for human consumption?

Meat quality and safety has improved dramatically over the last century. The truth is that meat eating in developed nations is safer now than at any time in human history. Why is that? Let us look at some of the changes that have taken place after Ellen White's era:

• Inspections - Meat plants are under strict quality controls and inspected regularly by government inspectors.

• Testing - Meat is regularly tested for a wide variety of bacteria, pesticides, antibiotics and hormones. If danger is detected, the meat is withdrawn immediately from market.

• Refrigeration - Refrigeration is the foremost method of controlling the growth of bacteria. Refrigeration was not widely available in Mrs. White's era. It is today, and as a result, meat is much safer today.

• Irradiation - In the 1980s and 1990s, irradiation was approved by the United States to kill bacteria in meat. A major advance in meat safety, very low levels of radiation are used to kill all bacteria in meat products.

• Education - The U.S. Department of Agriculture has designed a comprehensive microbiological control and prevention program covering all steps from farm to table. The Department of Agriculture requires labels that give instructions for safe handling and cooking on all packages of meat and poultry.

Let us examine some of the current concerns about meat:

Pesticides - Recent analyses by the Food and Drug Administration, Department of Agriculture, and other agencies show that the levels of pesticide residues in foods sold in the United States are well within acceptable limits. Many of the samples tested had no detectable residues.

Antibiotics - Antibiotics are generally fed to beef cattle only for short periods of time immediately after the animals arrive in feedlots. These drugs are not commonly used anytime close to slaughter, and government monitoring programs show that the drugs do not cause antibiotic residue problems. Contrary to popular opinion, there has never been any conclusive evidence that the feeding of subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics to farm animals is a hazard to human health. The most recent review of this subject by the National Academy of Sciences has concurred with earlier evaluations by concluding that it was not possible to find direct evidence establishing the existence of a human health hazard from the feeding of subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics to livestock. This conclusion applies to the relatively extensive use of antibiotics in poultry production as well as the much more limited use in the production of beef cattle.

Hormones - The use of hormones (such as estrogens) to promote growth in cattle is under strict government control. The amount of hormones present in cattle that have been castrated and then treated with replacement hormones is actually lower than that in intact cows or bulls. Hormone levels in beef (whether treated or untreated) are lower than in many plant foods. In fact, foods of plant origin contribute more estrogen to typical diets than beef does.

Microbiological Contamination - This is a real threat to the health of the public. Proper cooking and good sanitary practices can minimize this type of contamination.

Colon Cancer - According to the Nurses Health Study, women who ate meat daily had an increased risk of colon cancer. However, those who consumed it up to four times weekly did not have a statistically significant increase in colon cancer risk when compared with those who ate meat less than once a month. When the women were divided into five equal groups, ranging from the lowest to the highest meat intakes, only the group with the highest intake showed an increased risk of colon cancer; the others did not. (The women in the highest one-fifth consumed at least four and a half ounces of meat per day, every day.)

Conclusions:

The facts, proven by science, show that eating a moderate amount of lean meat does not pose a statistically significant health risk to humans. Furthermore, for those who choose to eat meat, it is an important source of critical proteins, vitamins, and minerals. But what about Ellen White's prediction about meat becoming unsafe?

• Meat safety has greatly improved over the last century.
• Meat is much safer now than in the 1800s when Mrs. White was eating it.

Is Drinking Milk Unsafe?⁸

Ellen White implied it would soon be unsafe" to drink milk. Was that prediction accurate? On the contrary, milk has never been safer to drink than it is today. Again, government inspections and testing, along with refrigeration, have greatly improved the quality of milk. But nothing has improved the quality of milk as much as pasteurization. Unfortunately for Mrs. White, she never saw pasteurizations in any of her "visions". If she had, she might not have made all of the claims about the soon-coming dangers of drinking milk. Before the widespread introduction of pasteurization about 75 years ago, milk was a vehicle by which infectious diseases were frequently transmitted. Pasteurization and improved sanitation have virtually eliminated this problem.

Dr. Ronald Kleinman, a spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics, writes:

"Milk and dairy products are safe and nutritious foods for growing children, and parents should make use of them unless there's some specific medical reason to avoid them." ... "dairy products are not perfect foods, but they are concentrated with many of the forms of nutrients that children need to grow well."

Let us examine some of the current concerns about milk:

Saturated Fat - This is a legitimate concern, but is easily resolved by the widespread availability of low fat and reduced fat milk products.

Pesticides - Residues in milk are not a significant health threat. As is the case with other food commodities, the minute quantities of pesticides occasionally found in milk are well below the tolerances set by the government and do not pose a health hazard. Both the cow's digestive system and the milk secretion process provide a measure of screening which protects the consumer of milk from many potentially harmful substances. For example, milk contains far lower concentrations of arsenic, cadmium and mercury than are found in the cows' feed or in most other foods consumed by humans.

Antibiotics - As with pesticides, drug residues are not a major problem. It is true that there have been instances in the past in which dairy farmers have violated regulations and allowed milk containing antibiotics to be sold. (The milk is supposed to be discarded until drug treatment ends and the cow stops secreting the drug in her milk.) Such incidents have always been rare, however, and they are now being prevented by better enforcement efforts. A nationwide milk quality program is in place that prevents milk containing illegal antibiotic residues from entering the marketplace. All loads of milk are tested for these residues, and any load that contains them is rejected and cannot be sold.

Conclusions:

There are some people who are allergic to milk or have difficulty digesting milk, and it makes sense for these people to avoid milk. Aside from these cases, drinking low fat milk does not pose a significant health risk to humans. Besides, milk is an important source of proteins, vitamins, and calcium. Now, what about Mrs. White's predictions about the need to soon discard milk?

• Milk safety has greatly improved over the last century.
• Thanks to pasteurization, dairy products are much safer now than in the 1800s when Mrs. White was using them.

What about Eggs?⁹

Much of what has already been said about refrigeration, education, labeling instructions, and government inspection and testing applies to the quality and safety of eggs.

Let us examine some of the current concerns about eggs:

Cholesterol - Eggs yolks are high in cholesterol. They are, in fact, the largest single source of cholesterol among the foods commonly eaten in the U.S. Extensive scientific research, including major studies completed within the last few years, shows that dietary cholesterol has only a small effect on blood cholesterol and that little if any relationship exists between egg consumption and heart disease risk in healthy people. In response to these findings, experts have stopped recommending a specific limit to the number of egg yolks consumed per week but have instead advised people to use eggs in moderation as part of a diet that meets the established guidelines for saturated fat and cholesterol intake.

Bacteria - Concerns have also been raised about the microbiological safety of eggs. The presence of Salmonella bacteria in a small proportion of the eggs on the market need not be a problem if the eggs are handled and prepared properly. Adequate cooking destroys Salmonella and makes the eggs safe to eat.

One large egg provides about six grams of protein, about half of which is in the egg white. The white of an egg is considered an ideal protein — the one by which all others are measured — because it contains all the amino acids needed for human nutrition and offers them in the proper balance. As for other nutritional benefits:

• Eggs are significant source of iron, riboflavin, folate, and vitamins B12, D, and E. An egg's contribution of vitamin D is noteworthy because eggs are one of the very few foods that supply this nutrient.
• Eggs are easily digested, making them valuable dietary components for people who are ill or convalescing.
• While eggs do not provide an abundance of any one nutrient, they offer substantial amounts of a wide variety. That quality elevates eggs into the ranks of "nutrient-dense foods," which means they provide a relatively high proportion of essential nutrients while supplying only a relatively small number of calories.
• Eggs contain the carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin, which are being investigated to determine whether they have health benefits.

Recent research indicates that egg eaters are more likely than non-egg eaters to have diets that provide adequate amounts of essential nutrients.

Conclusion:

Eggs are nutritious food, providing high-quality protein, vitamins and minerals. Even Mrs. White said that eggs contain "remedial properties" and recommended her followers get their eggs from healthy hens. But what about her warning that "soon" eggs would be unsafe to eat?

• Thanks to government inspections, refrigeration, and testing, eggs are safer now than ever.
• Ellen White's dire warnings about animal products are yet another example of her many failed predictions.

Conclusion

Mrs. White's prophecy regarding the safety of animal products has proven to be a monumental failure. If anything, the safety and quality of animal products have improved dramatically over the last 100 years. While a vegetarian diet has its advantages, a moderate amount of lean meat, low-fat milk, and eggs can provide proteins, vitamins and minerals essential for human growth and development.

For Further Research:

Modern Medicine Proves White Wrong

More on Ellen White and Meat Eating by Dr. Gregory Hunt

1. The author is a life-long vegetarian for health, environmental, and humanitarian reasons. He strongly believes a carefully planned vegetarian diet is the best diet for humanity, both physically, mentally, and spiritually. However, he believes some Ellen White followers have vastly overstated the risks of eating animal products in order to convince others she was a prophet. These followers sometimes fail to tell people that a moderate use of low-fat animal products will not result in a statistically significant increase in the risk of acquiring cancer or other diseases, and will not markedly reduce their life span. In fact, the longest-living people in the world, the Hunzas of Pakistan who live to be 120 to 140 years old, out-live the average SDA vegetarian by over 30 years. The Hunzas eat a moderate amount of lean meat in their diet. The author does not believe any person should be judged for what he eats or drinks: "For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs [Greek: lacanon = vegetables]. Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him." (Romans 14:2,3).

2. Ellen White, Counsels on Diet and Foods, p. 411, from a letter written to a physician from Stanmore, Sydney, N. S. W., July 26, 1896.

3. Ellen White, Union Conference Record (Australasian), July 28, 1899.

4. Ellen White, Letter 14, 1901, p. 3. (To Dr. S. Rand, January 22, 1901.) Also found in Manuscript Releases, vol. 8, p. 384, para. 2.

5. Ellen White, Testimonies, vol. 7, p. 135.

6. Ellen White, Ministry of Health, pp. 320-21.

7. Much of the material in this section is extracted from the document The Beef Controversy (PDF format).

8. The material in this section was extracted from Much Ado About Milk (PDF format) .

9. Kathleen Meister, "Eggs: Not as Bad as They're Cracked Up to Be".